Posts Tagged ‘Saul Alinsky’

America’s Stealth Marxist Revolution #1

April 25, 2020

America’s Stealth Marxist Revolution #1

The radical-leftist-branch of the democrat party is America’s Public Enemy #1!

They have long been about the business of dismantling America’s great Constitutional Republic, accelerating this effort dramatically with the election of the Obama administration.

This Marxist agenda was frustrated with the profoundly unexpected electoral failure to transfer Obama’s presidential power to Hillary Clinton, who is also a proven life-long Marxist revolutionary. 

See the truth about Hillary and her Marxist revolutionary associates.

The election of President Trump has exponentially frustrated America’s Stealth Marxist Revolutionaries and their leftist supporters abroad. Psychology’s Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis research predicts that there will likely be an increased probability of aggression from animals (including humans, of course!) when their goals are frustrated or they experience aversive (unpleasant or painful) stimulation.

Trump’s election produced great frustration among America’s Marxist Revolutionaries. What followed was a massive explosion of hysterical leftist democrat verbal and political attacks upon him, just as predicted.

Furthermore, Trump’s election produced an avalanche of verbal and physical attacks upon his supporters by rioting leftists, including a new revolutionary group called Antifa.

Perhaps you have time to learn about psychology’s interesting Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis. It is certainly operational in the case of America’s Stealth Marxist Revolution’s crazed attacks on President Trump and his supporters. Nevertheless, Trump has bravely and skillfully reversed many of the “progressive” “transformations” of America gained during the previous eight-year reign of President Obama: A true revolutionary Marxist.

Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis

This is Part-One of a much longer story about America’s ongoing Stealth Marxist Revolution. 

Your vote in November 2020 will determine the outcome of this attempted leftist revolution.

More on America’s Continuing Stealth Marxist Revolution will be forthcoming.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 4/25/20



Obama: Destroying America…On Purpose!

November 18, 2015

Obama: Destroying America…On Purpose!

Many talk of America’s President Obama as one who is incompetent, feckless, delusional, or one who living in a fantasy world.

So it is, I am sure, for the average radical liberal-progressive socialist.

But this is not true of Obama: A man of pathological stubbornness, one who makes “mistake” after “mistake” and “inexplicably” does not learn from the consequences of his actions.

Obama. A man who lies, cheats and deceives like no other President in my life-time (73 yrs.), perhaps no other the history of America. He even eclipses President Nixon, who at least had the decency to resign after disgracing himself with his dishonesty. His disgraceful actions even eclipses Presidents Kennedy and Clinton, in spite of their disgraceful extramarital sexual escapades in the White House and elsewhere. At least Kennedy fought to keep America safe. Clinton worked keep  America strong.

Obama is an American President like no other American President, ever.

I have studied Obama’s behavior patterns and I have observed his lies and deceptions for nearly eight years.

As a behavioral psychologist, I give evaluative primacy to the consistency of his behavior patterns. Having recognized Obama as pathological liar and one never to be trusted, it is essential to watch only what he does and to never be seduced by what he says.

On this basis, I am forced to conclude that his actions are highly purposeful and destructive to the best interests of America. But, nothing he has done or is now doing is accidental.

Obama is purposefully trying to destroy America and he is attempting to facilitate a New World Order featuring a dramatically increased Islamic influence, perhaps even hegemony.

As you will see,  Bill O’Reilly is still convinced that he is “Delusional”. I agree with Bill on  many of his judgments and conclusions…but not this one.

President Obama is a very intelligent, agenda driven, lying, and cheating, traditional-America-hating politician. His methods are distinctly derived from Karl Marx ( ), Antonio Gramsci ( ) and Saul Alinsky ( ). It is their revolutionary theories and tactics that match Obama’s actions to near perfection.

Soon, I will provide you with a series of my historical blogs that will make this case. I hope you will visit my website frequently in the near future to see the evidence that I have accrued over-time.

I will work backward from a recent video featuring Bill O’Reilly’s assessment of Obama’s actions and current world events, understandable to all, but the brain-dead.

I hope you will follow-along and Sound-off here, pro or con!

Now see O’Reilly’s on President Obama’s behavior patterns.

V. Thomas Mawhinney

P.S. Follow me…and tell your friends and relatives. Especially help your liberal/progressive friends to see the light! Click on the “Follow” window on the upper right of this page.



An Impeachable Offense!

November 16, 2014

An Impeachable Offense!

In the following video, both Kelly and Charles Krauthammer seem not to comprehend that Obama fully understands that an Executive order will set a precedent for future Presidents to steal power away from Congress and the American citizens they represent. Kelly and Charles oddly agree that Obama’s promised move is “short-sighted” because republicans will likely do the same to the democrats in retaliation.

But, they underestimate him. There is no way Obama fails to understand this massively damaging Constitutional outcome.

Obama is far from short-sighted.

Obama’s short-term goal is to set conditions that will dismantle America’s Constitutional Republic in order to further his long-term post-presidential goals of a socialized America increasingly managed by simple presidential dictate.

Obama is a traitorous genius and he must be impeached in spite of the short-term political and social disruptions it may cause. I conclude this because the long-range disasters wrought by his dictatorial successes are more likely destroy our Citizen’s Republic: The one that was once the world’s great and miraculous America.

I fear that most American’s do not understand that Marxist Obama was placed in the Presidency to destroy America and he is succeeding amazingly well. Those who surreptitiously orchestrated his rise to power will remain behind the scenes for sometime to come.

I urge you to read Chandler’s book, The Shadow World. Or, search   on my blog site for some reviews of it. Please also read Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for radicals. You may also search on this blog site for my reviews of Alinsky’s dastardly methods for fomenting revolutions.

Understand that Obama is a political student and teacher of these and other similar manifestos of social and political revolution.

You will find that the discussion below foreshadows my grave concerns.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, 11/16/14

The Seeds of America’s Destruction

November 16, 2013

The Seeds of America’s Destruction

As Francis Fukuyama (2006) has reminded us: “let us accept the Hegelian-Marxist thesis that past history has proceeded dialectically, or through a process of contradiction, leaving aside for the time being the question of whether the dialect has an ideal or material basis. That is, a certain form of socio-political organization arises in some part of the world, but contains its own internal contradiction which over time leads to its own undermining and replacement by a different and more successful one.

It appears to be true that each socio-political form of government including our own Constitutional Republic, carries with it its own unique seeds of destruction. From a broad historical perspective, these inherent weaknesses often combine with outside forces of attack or natural disasters to bring them down. Such “undermining and replacement” does not always directly lead to a more successful socio-political entity, however.

F. A Hayek (1944), attempted to warn the world about one kind of transformational force in socio-cultural evolution and revolution. Hayek after experiencing the effects of so-called “social democracy”, Totalitarianism and Fascism in Europe, wrote a definitive book on these matters and on free society. The title of the book was The Road To Serfdom. In his introduction to this book, Republished in 2007, Bruce Caldwell summarized its essence most succinctly: “the actual implementation of a centrally planned society would be inimical to liberty” (p.33).

 Hayek observed that socialism inevitably led to the loss of liberty for the citizens so governed. He asserted that they were seduced by their fervent desires for security to give up their individual freedoms, in various gradations, only to find to their horror that they had come close control of their inept, inefficient, and dictatorial State cultural planners.

 “That democratic socialism, the great utopia of the last few generations, is not only unachievable, but that to strive for it produces something so utterly different that few of those who now wish it would be prepared to accept the consequences, many will not believe until the connection has been laid bare in all its aspects” (p. 82).

 Some may wonder what Hayek meant when he talked about the “consequences” that must be “laid bare” before well-intentioned socialists will believe it. A stunning contemporary example is emerging in America’s current President Obama who promised his followers that he would “Transform America!”. An analysis of his personal history strongly suggests that this transformation is a perfect example of what Hayek was trying to warn everyone about.

 Indeed, President Obama’s most intimate associations, from childhood till now have been socialists, communists and revolutionaries. Frank Marshal Davis, his own Father, William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, and Alice Palmer are only several of the many documented. Also documented is his discipleship with Saul Alinsky methods (author of Rules for Radicals) and radical preacher Jeremiah (“God Damn America”) Wright. Do not forget his intimate association with ACORN, a socialist political action front group.

There is much more evidence that could be marshaled to document President Obama’s Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Islamic associations and influences, but what I have provided are sufficient examples for now.

 Though I must call for his impeachment, my attack is not against President Obama, the person, and it is certainly not against his ethnicity. The impeachable offence is his political occult philosophy and his predictably dishonest actions furthering the rise of a Marxist-based socialism in America against the will of the majority of citizens.

What is of the greatest immediate importance to recognize are the predictable “consequences”, “laid bare”. To fail in this is will be to fail to heed F. A. Hayek’s warnings about socialism with great and tragic consequences for all citizens of America.

Stay tuned for more of this….

VTM, 11/16/13

Obama: I Told You So #2

May 17, 2013

Obama: I told You So # 2
I posted the following on Oct. 28, 2010.  If you are tuned into the current scandals surrounding the Obama Administration, you need no further introduction to the following blog.


Obama: A Student, Teacher, Practitioner of the Alinsky School of Revolution

In his pamphlet on this topic, “Rules for Revolution”, David Horiwitz documents the strong connection between President Obama and Saul Alinsky, the radical revolutionary Saul Alinsky.

On page 13:

“Three of Obama’s mentors in Chicago were trained at the Alinsky Industrial Areas Foundation, and for several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method”.

Page 14:

“‘On Barack Obama’s presidential campaign website, one could see a photo of Obama in a classroom “teaching students Alinskyan methods. He stood in front of a blackboard on which he has written, “Power Analysis’ and ‘ Relationships Built on Self Interest…”‘

On pages 14 and 15:

A summary of Obama’s Acorn involvement was described by the Wall Street Journal.

In 1991, he took time off from his law firm to run a voter-registration drive for Project Vote, an Acorn partner that was soon fully absorbed under the Acorn umbrella. The drive registered 135,00 voters and was considered a major factor in the upset victory of Democrat Carol Moseley Braun over incumbent Democratic Senator Alan Dixon in the 1992 Democratic Senate primary. Mr. Obama’s success made him a hot commodity on the community organizing circuit. He became a top trainer at Acorn’s Chicago conferences. In 1995, he became Acorn’s attorney, participating in a landmark case to force the state of Illinois to implement the federal Motor Voter Law. The law’s loose voter registration requirements would later be exploited by Acorn employees in an effort to flood voter rolls with fake names. In (1996), Mr. Obama filled out a questionnaire listing key supporters for his campaign for the Illinois Senate. He put Acorn first (it was not an alphabetical list).

End of all Quotes.

In the final analysis, though Alinsky was dead by the time Obama came on the scene, Obama was trained by Alinsky’s students and became a teacher of his socialist revolutionary strategies which were based upon deception, deceit and opportunism.

With Alinsky, “The issue is never the issue. The Issue is the revolution” (p. 10). The ends always justified the means.

With President Obama the issue is not health care, global warming, cap and trade, or stimulating the economy, etc., it is a revolutionary progressive transformation of a capitalistic society to a socialistic one.

Wake-Up America!

Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.

To learn much more: Read the following: Click on Quick view.

Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – Untitled

File Format: PDF/Adobe AcrobatQuick View
David Horowitz Freedom Center. PO Box 55089. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423. (800) 752-6562.…/Rules%20for%20Revolution%20(2).pdfSimilar


Crazy Paranoia or The Promised “Transform America”: You Decide!

March 9, 2013

Crazy Paranoia or The Promised “Transform America”: You Decide!

When Obama first campaigned for the Presidency, he promised to “Transform America”. That his meaning, at the time, was unclear is an understatement. Obama is a master at verbal and political deception.

He promised an honest, transparent, and open administration. Yet, he has only delivered lies, impenetrable evasiveness, and an administration closed to nearly all traditional American values and ideals.

I have repeatedly warned that Obama had been schooled in the radical revolutionary methods of Saul Alinski. Moreover, he had become a teacher/preacher of Alinski’s methods for socialistic/communistic revolutionary methods. Please  do a search on this blog. Enter “Saul Alinski” in the search window above and on the right side of the page and press the enter key.

I doubt that most of my readers are familiar with Alinski’s revolutionary precepts and methods. Please familiarize yourself with his ideology by reviewing the following excellent summary of his quotations (I do not endorse some of the reader remarks at the end of his quotes). Alinski’e quotes are my only focus and concern. You will easily recognize them in Obama’s behavior patterns.

The following article compiles Obama’s many initiatives that closely conform to Alinski’s dictates and that uniformly weaken our the American socioculture. This article warns that Obama’s actions are all in systematic preparation for his promised “transformation of America”: A true political revolution by designed cultural decline, ultimately solidified by force.

Crazy Paranoia or The Promised “Transform America”: You Decide!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.,  3/9/12

A Fact-Check on Obama/Biden

September 7, 2012

A Fact-Check on Obama/Biden

So what would you expect from a party that had to cheat on the DNC convention voice-vote to get the word “God” back into the platform..after they had purposefully taken it out?

What would you expect from a leader of a political Party that had been trained in the revolutionary doctrine of , Saul Alinsky, and who-himself-had been a teacher of that doctrine!?

Below a the fact check on the Obama and Biden speeches at the DNC.

For a real treat, read the Alinsky quotes that follow, I have highlighted quotes that I think are particularly germane to the deceitful nature of the Democratic Party. But, you may find other the quotes of great interest also. In my view, Alinsky is a modern-day Niccolo Machiavelli and so are President Obama and his czars and other minions.

VTM, 9/1/2012

The Best Quotes From Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals.”
Written By : John Hawkins May 3, 2010

Ironically, one of the hottest new books for conservatives is far left-winger Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, which was written way back in 1971.

After reading the book, my personal opinion is that Alinsky was a brilliant yet cynical, habitually dishonest, utterly amoral human being with a deep understanding of large swathes of human nature. Was he a good guy? No, not at all. But, is there a lot conservatives can learn from his tactics? Absolutely. Some of it we can apply and some of it we can see how the Left has applied it against us. With that in mind, here are the quotes that jumped out at me in Alinsky’s tome:

This failure of many of our younger activists to understand the art of communication has been disastrous. Even the most elementary grasp of the fundamental idea that one communicates within the experience of his audience — and gives full respect to the other’s values — would have ruled out attacks on the American flag. — P. xviii

As an organizer I start where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be. That we accept the world as it is does not in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what we believe it should be — it is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be. — P. xix

“Power comes out of the barrel of a gun!” is an absurd ralling cry when the other side has all the guns. — xxi

A reformation means that masses of our people have reached the point of disillusionment with past ways and values. They don’t know what will work but they do know that the prevailing system is self-defeating, frustrating, and hopeless. They won’t act for change, but won’t strongly oppose those who do. The time is then ripe for revolution. — xxii

But the answer I gave the young radicals seemed to me the only realistic one: “Do one of three things. One, go find a wailing wall and feel sorry for yourselves. Two, go psycho and start bombing — but this only swings  people to the right. Three, learn a lesson. Go home, organize, build power and at the next convention, you be the delegates.” — xxiii

The preferred world can be seen any evening on television in the succession of programs where the good always wins — that is, until the late evening newscast, when suddenly we are plunged into the world as it is. Political realists see the world as it is: an arena of power politics moved primarily by perceived immediate self-interests, where morality is rhetorical rationale for expedient action and self-interest. Two examples would be the priest who wants to be a bishop and bootlicks and politicks his way up, justifying it with the rationale, “After I get to be bishop I’ll use my office for Christian reformation,” or the businessman who reasons, “First I’ll make my million and after that I’ll go for the real things in life,” Unfortunately one changes in many ways on the road to the bishopric or the first million, and then one says, “I’ll wait until I’m a cardinal and then I can be more effective,” or “I can do a lot more after I get two million” — and so it goes. In this world laws are written for the lofty aim of “the common good” and then acted out in life on the basis of the common greed. — P.12-13

It is not a world of peace and beauty and dispassionate rationality, but as Henry James once wrote, “Life is, in fact, a battle. Evil is insolent and strong; beauty enchanting, but rare; goodness very apt to be weak; folly very apt to be defiant; wickedness to carry the day; imbeciles to be in great places, people of sense in small, and mankind generally unhappy. But the world as it stands is no narrow illusion, no phantasm, no evil dream of the night; we wake up to it again forever and ever; and we can neither forget it nor deny it nor dispence with it.” Henry James’ statement is an affirmation of that of Job: “The life of man upon earth is a warfare…” — P.14

The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means. It is this species of man who so vehemently and militantly participated in that clasically idealistic debate at the old League of Nations on the ethical differences between defensive and offensive weapons. Their fears of action drive them to refuge in an ethics so divorced for the politics of life that it can apply only to angels, not men. — P.26

One’s concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s personal interest in the issue. — P.26

The secretary inquired how Churchill, the leading British anti-communist, could reconcile himself to being on the same side as the Soviets. Would Churchill find it embarassing and difficult to ask his government to support the communists? Churchill’s reply was clear and unequivocal: “Not at all. I have only one purpose, the destruction of Hitler, and my life is much simplified thereby. If Hitler invaded Hell I would at least make a favorable reference to the Devil in the House of Commons.” — P.29

The fifth rules of the ethics of means and ends is that concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa. To the man of action the first criterion in determining which means to employ is to assess what means are available. Reviewing and selecting available means is done on a straight utilitarian basis — will it work? Moral questions may enter when one chooses among equally effective alternate means. — P.32

The seventh rule of ethics and means and ends is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics. The judgment of history leans heavily on the outcome of success and failure; it spells the difference between the traitor and the patriotic hero. There can be no such thing as a successful traitor, for if one succeeds he becomes a founding father. P.34

The ninth rule of the ethics of means and ends is that any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical. — P.35

The tenth rule of the ethics of rules and means is that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral arguments. …the essence of Lenin’s speeches during this period was “They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.” And it was. — P.36-37

Eight months after securing independence (from the British), the Indian National Congress outlawed passive resistance and made it a crime. It was one thing for them to use the means of passive resistance against the previous Haves, but now in power they were going to ensure that this means would not be used against them. — P.43

All effective actions require the passport of morality. — P.44

But to the organizer, compromise is a key and beautiful word. It is always present in the pragmatics of operation. It is making the deal, getting that vital breather, usually the victory. If you start with nothing, demand 100 per cent, then compromise for 30 per cent, you’re 30 per cent ahead. — P.59

The organizer becomes a carrier for the contagion of curiousity, for a people asking “why” are beginning to rebel. — P.72

To realistically appraise and anticipate the probably reactions of the enemy, he must be able to identify with them, too, in his imagination and forsee their reactions to his actions. — P.74

With very rare exceptions, the right things are done for the wrong reasons. It is futile to demand that men do the right thing for the right reason — this is a fight with a windmill. — P.76

The moment one gets into the area of $25 million and above, let alone a billion, the listener is completely out of touch, no longer really interested because the figures have gone above his experience and almost are meaningless. Millions of Americans do not know how many million dollars make up a billion. — P.96

If the organizer begins with an affirmation of love for people, he promptly turns everyone off. If, on the other hand, he begins with a denunciation of exploiting employers, slum landlords, police shakedowns, gouging merchants, he is inside their experience and they accept him. — P.98

The job of the organizer is to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a “dangerous enemy.” — P.100

The organizer dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. — P.116-117

Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people.

…The third rule is: Whereever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.

…the fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

…the sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.

…the seventh rule  is: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

…the eighth rule: Keep the pressure on.

…the ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than  the thing itself.

The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.

…The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.

…The twelth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.

…The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. — P.126-129

One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other. A leader may struggle toward a decision and weigh the merits and demerits of a situation which is 52 per cent positive and 48 per cent negative, but once the decision is reached he must assume that his cause is 100 per cent positive and the opposition 100 per cent negative. He can’t toss forever in limbo, and avoid decision. He can’t weigh arguments or reflect endlessly — he must decide and act. — P.134

It should be remembered that you can threaten the enemy and get away with it. You can insult and annoy him, but the one thing that  is  unforgivable and that is certain to get him to react is to laugh at him. This causes irrational anger. — P.134-135

I have on occasion remarked that I felt confident that I could persuade a millionaire on a Friday to subsidize a revolution for Saturday out of which he would make a huge profit on Sunday even though he was certain to be executed on Monday. — P.150

For example, since the Haves publicly pose as the custodians of responsbility, morality, law, and justice (which are frequently strangers to each others), they can be constantly pushed to live up to their own book of morality and regulations. No organizations, including organized religion, can live up to the letter of its own book. You can club them to death with their “book” of rules and regulations. This is what that great revolutionary, Paul of Tarsus, knew when he wrote to the Corinthians: “Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit, for the letter killeth.” — P.152

The difference between fact and history was brought home when I was a visiting professor at a certain Eastern university. Two candidates there were taking their written examinations for the doctorate in community organization and criminology. I persuaded the president of this college to get me a copy of this examination and when I answered the questions the departmental head graded my paper, knowing only that I was an anonymous friend of the president. Three of the questions were on the philosophy of Saul Alinksy. I answered two of them incorrectly. I did not know what my philosophy or motivations were; but they did! — P.168

Many of the lower middle class are members of labor unions, churches, bowling clubs, fraternal, service, and nationality organizations. They are organizations and people that must be worked with as one would work with any other part of our populations — with respect, understanding, and sympathy. To reject them is to lose them by default. They will not shrivel and disappear. You can’t switch channels and get rid of them. This is what you have been doing in your radicalized dream world but they are here and will be. — P.189


Obama’s Law Against Free Speech

May 1, 2012

Obama’s Law Against Free Speech

President Obama is a Marxist in disguise. I understand that many view this kind of thinking as odd or quirky, or even paranoid.

But, as a licensed and practicing psychologist with over 30 years of experience, I will decide who’s thinking is odd, quirky, or paranoid.

I am sorry to be so blunt. I am just one who  has transferred my 36 years of experience as a professor of psychology studying the influence and control of human behavior into my research on the topic of The Culture Wars.

Dear friend, and I say this with great respect and gentle kindness: If you cannot see the culture wars raging all around you; transforming you, your friend’s, your children’s and grandchildren’s perceptions, thoughts and values, and behaviors, then it is imperative that you immediately go work to sharpen your reality testing skills.

If the average freedom and independence-loving, intelligent man or woman will just put a couple of hours a week into researching the failed “barrel-of-a-gun” Marxist/Leninist culture war strategies vs. the more contemporary Antonio Gramsci methodology, they will be stunned by their new world view.

Gramsci preached a decades-long Marxist transformation strategy in which the thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors of populations were won-over slowly, by emphasising peace and cooperation for the common good. This approach is based upon infiltrating targeted governments and working surreptitiously from within. Obama’s hybrid methodology includes a somewhat stronger arm, though deception remains his primary tool, as advocated by the American revolutionary Saul Alinsky.

Obama’s preference for a somewhat more repressive methodology can be seen in the video clip below. It can also be seen in his call for a Civil Military just a powerful as our National Military of a short time ago (Are The Brown Shirts are coming?).  If doubt me, just see below:

Why don’t you spend some time going over a few of my past blogs on this topic and checking out the validity of my resources?

Or, see below, for just one more powerful example of, Obama’s Marxist strategy and goals.

VTM, 5/1/12

Islamization of Europe and America: Truth or Hate Speech? You Had Better Figure It Out!

April 3, 2011

Islamization of Europe and America: Truth or Hate Speech? You Had Better Figure It Out!

Geert Wilders is now in court in the Netherlands defending himself against charges of hate speech. The following is an example of what he has been saying in many European countries and the U.S. over the past several years.

I believe Geert Wilders is telling one of many truths that have been outlawed by the religion of progressive socialism and imposed upon all of us through its canon laws of multiculturalism and politically correct speech.

Interestingly, this deceptive and repressive political strategy reflects the teachings of  Saul Alinsky, who’s tactics were closely studied by President Obama (see my previous posts on this topic).   These tactics  are stunningly similar to those of Islamic Stealth Jihad and Sharia Creep, truthfully reported and accurately labeled, by Wilders, as inimical to freedom and democracy.

Wake-Up America!

Thanks to my life-long friend Gene for sending me the article which follows. You must take time to read and contemplate its implications for our future.

I will provide more on this topic in future blogs.

VTM   4/3/11


This Might Give You Chills
Geert Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament.

Here is a speech by Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the “Facing Jihad Conference” in Jerusalem .

Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission.  All is not well in the old world.  There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic.  We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe.  This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West.  The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe .  Then, I will say a few things about Islam.  To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks.  But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world.  It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen.  And if they are, they might regret it.  This goes for the police as well.  It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children.  Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead.  With mosques on many street corners.  The shops have signs you and I cannot read.  You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity.  These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics.  These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe .  These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe .  With larger congregations than there are in churches.  And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region.  Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden .  In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim.  Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods.  Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.  In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims.  Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’.  Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin .  The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves.  Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels , because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II.  French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya , Israel .  I could go on forever with stories like this.  Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe .  San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.  Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers.  And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate.  But there are few signs of that.  The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France .  One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks.  The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate.  Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’.  And this is how we give them respect.  We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority.  We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots.  Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus.  I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’.  Because that is what they are.  They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam  Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.  Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet.  His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized.  Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem.  But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time.  Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed.  Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza.  If it is good for Islam, it is good.  If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins.  But in its essence Islam is a political ideology.  It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person.  Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life.  Islam means ‘submission’.  Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia.  If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.  The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor.  I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times.  I support Israel .  First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance.  Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan , Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia .  Israel is simply in the way.  The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel .  It is a war against the West.  It is jihad.  Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us.  If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest.  Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities.  But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values.  On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam.  They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed.  The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning.  It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination.  If they can get Israel , they can get everything  So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’.  In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II.  And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat.  Yet there is a greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing.  The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine.  An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs.  With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem .

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts.  My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives.  All throughout Europe , American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish.  My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians.  We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe ‘s children in the same state in which it was offered to us.  We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams.  Future generations would never forgive us.  We cannot squander our liberties.  We simply do not have the right to do so.

We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.

Marxism In America ? It’s Already Happening!

November 29, 2010

Marxism In America? It’s Already Happening! 

Most Americans are oblivious to the Marxist nature of the Obama Administration. In previous posts, I have revealed President Obama’s strong involvement in the Saul Alinsky Model for advancing the causes of socialism in America through lies, deception and other ruthless means.

The following video provides a clearer context for these allegations. As a psychologist, I have long ago learned a valuable rule-of-thumb: “Listen to what they say, but more importantly, watch what they do.”

I ask you to please click on the following URL  to view a video of the well-documented Marxist strategies now unfolding within our Federal Government. Take time to look-up the supporting references for  Lt. General (Ret) W. G. Boykin’s video warning of our Obama’s Marxist plans for America.                  

Wake-Up America!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D. ,   11/29/10

 P.S. Thanks to Fred Richardson for sending  me to this video.

%d bloggers like this: