Posts Tagged ‘President Obama’

“The New Barbarians”, by Bill Whittle

December 15, 2014

“The New Barbarians”, by Bill Whittle

I fully endorse the contents of this video and I hope you will too.

Please share it with you family and friends.

Also, be sure to visit Bill Whittle’s Truth Revolt web site. There you will find truths that could save America.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-lena-dunham-al-sharpton-eric-holder-and-new-barbarism

V. Thomas Mawhinney,  12/15/14

Judge Jeanine “Gets It”…Do You?

July 13, 2014

Judge Jeanine “Gets It”…Do You?

Our Traitor in Chief, President Obama, is doing everything in his power to foment a demographic revolution in America.

Judge Jeanine is one of the few that will call it “what it is”!

See the following. Send it to others so they may awaken from their stressed and befuddled mental states. It is time to make war on the progressives at the polls!

I did not down load the viewer suggested on the screen. Just click on the play button a couple of times and it will start-up. It is well worth taking the time to see this one!

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3672753276001/judge-jeanine-president-needs-to-fix-border-mess-he-created/#sp=show-clips

V. Tom Mawhinney,    7/13/14

Obama: I Told You So #2

May 17, 2013

Obama: I told You So # 2
 
I posted the following on Oct. 28, 2010.  If you are tuned into the current scandals surrounding the Obama Administration, you need no further introduction to the following blog.

Quantcast

Obama: A Student, Teacher, Practitioner of the Alinsky School of Revolution

In his pamphlet on this topic, “Rules for Revolution”, David Horiwitz documents the strong connection between President Obama and Saul Alinsky, the radical revolutionary Saul Alinsky.

On page 13:

“Three of Obama’s mentors in Chicago were trained at the Alinsky Industrial Areas Foundation, and for several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method”.

Page 14:

“‘On Barack Obama’s presidential campaign website, one could see a photo of Obama in a classroom “teaching students Alinskyan methods. He stood in front of a blackboard on which he has written, “Power Analysis’ and ‘ Relationships Built on Self Interest…”‘

On pages 14 and 15:

A summary of Obama’s Acorn involvement was described by the Wall Street Journal.

In 1991, he took time off from his law firm to run a voter-registration drive for Project Vote, an Acorn partner that was soon fully absorbed under the Acorn umbrella. The drive registered 135,00 voters and was considered a major factor in the upset victory of Democrat Carol Moseley Braun over incumbent Democratic Senator Alan Dixon in the 1992 Democratic Senate primary. Mr. Obama’s success made him a hot commodity on the community organizing circuit. He became a top trainer at Acorn’s Chicago conferences. In 1995, he became Acorn’s attorney, participating in a landmark case to force the state of Illinois to implement the federal Motor Voter Law. The law’s loose voter registration requirements would later be exploited by Acorn employees in an effort to flood voter rolls with fake names. In (1996), Mr. Obama filled out a questionnaire listing key supporters for his campaign for the Illinois Senate. He put Acorn first (it was not an alphabetical list).

End of all Quotes.

In the final analysis, though Alinsky was dead by the time Obama came on the scene, Obama was trained by Alinsky’s students and became a teacher of his socialist revolutionary strategies which were based upon deception, deceit and opportunism.

With Alinsky, “The issue is never the issue. The Issue is the revolution” (p. 10). The ends always justified the means.

With President Obama the issue is not health care, global warming, cap and trade, or stimulating the economy, etc., it is a revolutionary progressive transformation of a capitalistic society to a socialistic one.

Wake-Up America!

Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.

To learn much more: Read the following: Click on Quick view.

Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – Untitled

File Format: PDF/Adobe AcrobatQuick View
David Horowitz Freedom Center. PO Box 55089. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423. (800) 752-6562. Elizabeth@horowitzfreedomcenter.org http://www.frontpagemag.com
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/…/Rules%20for%20Revolution%20(2).pdfSimilar

.

“Spread The Wealth Around”, President Obama

April 20, 2011

“Spread The Wealth Around”, President Obama

Founder's Quote Daily

“To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” –Thomas Jefferson, letter to Joseph Milligan, 1816

 From Founder’s Quote Daily

Islamization of Europe and America: Truth or Hate Speech? You Had Better Figure It Out!

April 3, 2011

Islamization of Europe and America: Truth or Hate Speech? You Had Better Figure It Out!

Geert Wilders is now in court in the Netherlands defending himself against charges of hate speech. The following is an example of what he has been saying in many European countries and the U.S. over the past several years.

I believe Geert Wilders is telling one of many truths that have been outlawed by the religion of progressive socialism and imposed upon all of us through its canon laws of multiculturalism and politically correct speech.

Interestingly, this deceptive and repressive political strategy reflects the teachings of  Saul Alinsky, who’s tactics were closely studied by President Obama (see my previous posts on this topic).   These tactics  are stunningly similar to those of Islamic Stealth Jihad and Sharia Creep, truthfully reported and accurately labeled, by Wilders, as inimical to freedom and democracy.

Wake-Up America!

Thanks to my life-long friend Gene for sending me the article which follows. You must take time to read and contemplate its implications for our future.

I will provide more on this topic in future blogs.

VTM   4/3/11

 

This Might Give You Chills
Geert Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament.


Here is a speech by Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the “Facing Jihad Conference” in Jerusalem .

Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission.  All is not well in the old world.  There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic.  We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe.  This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West.  The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe .  Then, I will say a few things about Islam.  To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks.  But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world.  It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen.  And if they are, they might regret it.  This goes for the police as well.  It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children.  Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead.  With mosques on many street corners.  The shops have signs you and I cannot read.  You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity.  These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics.  These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe .  These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe .  With larger congregations than there are in churches.  And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region.  Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden .  In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim.  Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods.  Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.  In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims.  Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’.  Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin .  The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves.  Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels , because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II.  French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya , Israel .  I could go on forever with stories like this.  Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe .  San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.  Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers.  And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate.  But there are few signs of that.  The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France .  One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks.  The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate.  Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’.  And this is how we give them respect.  We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority.  We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots.  Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus.  I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’.  Because that is what they are.  They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam  Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.  Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet.  His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized.  Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem.  But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time.  Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed.  Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza.  If it is good for Islam, it is good.  If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins.  But in its essence Islam is a political ideology.  It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person.  Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life.  Islam means ‘submission’.  Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia.  If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.  The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor.  I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times.  I support Israel .  First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance.  Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan , Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia .  Israel is simply in the way.  The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel .  It is a war against the West.  It is jihad.  Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us.  If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest.  Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities.  But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values.  On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam.  They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed.  The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning.  It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination.  If they can get Israel , they can get everything  So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’.  In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II.  And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat.  Yet there is a greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing.  The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine.  An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs.  With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem .

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts.  My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives.  All throughout Europe , American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish.  My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians.  We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe ‘s children in the same state in which it was offered to us.  We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams.  Future generations would never forgive us.  We cannot squander our liberties.  We simply do not have the right to do so.

We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.

It Hurts To Laugh!

February 18, 2011

 It Hurts To Laugh!

chuck asay
BY CHUCK ASAY
Wed, Feb 9, 2011
bob gorrell
BY BOB GORRELL
  • Wed, Feb 9, 2011
    michael ramirez
  • BY RICHARD RAMIREZ
  • Mon, Feb 7, 2011
    michael ramirez 
  • BY RICHARD RAMIREZ
  • Fri, Feb 11, 2011

    chip bok
    BY CHIP BOK
     
    All of these cartoons are from  www.Townhall.com  I recommend you visit there often.
    VTM,         2/18/11

    Obama: A Student, Teacher, Practitioner of the Alinsky School of Revolution

    October 28, 2010

    Obama: A Student, Teacher, Practitioner of the Alinsky School of Revolution

    In his pamphlet on this topic, “Rules for Revolution”, David Horiwitz documents the strong connection between President Obama and Saul Alinsky, the radical revolutionary.

    On page 13:

    “Three of Obama’s mentors in Chicago were trained at the Alinsky Industrial Areas Foundation, and for several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method”.

    Page 14:

    “‘On Barack Obama’s presidential campaign website, one could see a photo of Obama in a classroom “teaching students Alinskyan methods. He stood in front of a blackboard on which he has written, “Power Analysis’ and ‘ Relationships Built on Self Interest…”‘

    On pages 14 and 15:

    A summary of Obama’s Acorn involvement was described by the Wall Street Journal.

    In 1991, he took time off from his law firm to run a voter-registration drive for Project Vote, an Acorn partner that was soon fully absorbed under the Acorn umbrella. The drive registered 135,00 voters and was considered a major factor in the upset victory of Democrat Carol Moseley Braun over incumbent Democratic Senator Alan Dixon in the 1992 Democratic Senate primary. Mr. Obama’s success made him a hot commodity on the community organizing circuit. He became a top trainer at Acorn’s Chicago conferences. In 1995, he became Acorn’s attorney, participating in a landmark case to force the state of Illinois to implement the federal Motor Voter Law. The law’s loose voter registration requirements would later be exploited by Acorn employees in an effort to flood voter rolls with fake names. In (1996), Mr. Obama filled out a questionnaire listing key supporters for his campaign for the Illinois Senate. He put Acorn first (it was not an alphabetical list).

    End of all Quotes.

    In the final analysis, though Alinsky was dead by the time Obama came on the scene, Obama was trained by Alinsky’s students and became a teacher of his socialist revolutionary strategies which were based upon deception, deceit and opportunism.

    With Alinsky, “The issue is never the issue. The Issue is the revolution” (p. 10). The ends always justified the means.

    With President Obama the issue is not health care, global warming, cap and trade, or stimulating the economy, etc., it is a revolutionary progressive transformation of a capitalistic society to a socialistic one.

    Wake-Up America!

    Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.

    To learn much more: Read the following: Click on Quick view.

    Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – Untitled

    File Format: PDF/Adobe AcrobatQuick View
    David Horowitz Freedom Center. PO Box 55089. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423. (800) 752-6562. Elizabeth@horowitzfreedomcenter.org http://www.frontpagemag.com
    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/…/Rules%20for%20Revolution%20(2).pdfSimilar

    President Obama: Student, Teacher, Practitioner of Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals”.

    October 24, 2010

    President Obama: Student, Teacher, Practitioner of Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals”

    In his pamphlet on this topic, “Rules for Revolution”, David Horiwitz documents the strong connection between President Obama and Saul Alinsky, the radical revolutionary.

    On page 28, he quotes and interprets Alinsky:

    [The] failure of many of our younger activists to understand the art of communication has been disastrous,’ writes Alinsky. What he really means is their honesty has been disastrous, their failure to understand the art of mis-communication. This is the precise art that he teaches radicals who are trying  [to] impose socialism on a country whose people understand that socialism destroys freedom: Don’t sell it as socialism; sell it as ‘progressivism,’ ‘economic democracy,’ and ‘social justice.’

    The strategy of working within the system until you can accumulate enough power to destroy it was what sixties radicals called ‘boring from within.’ It was a strategy that the New Left despised even as Alinsky and his followers practiced it. Alinsky and his followers infiltrated the War on Poverty, made alliances with the Kennedys and the Democratic Party, and secured funds from the federal government. Like termites, they set about to eat away at the foundations building in expectation that one day they could cause its collapse.

    Alinsky’s advice can be summed up in the following way. Even though you are at war with the system, don’t confront it as an opposing army; join it and undermine it as a fifth column from within. To Achieve this infiltration you must work inside the system for the time being.

    End quote of David Horowitz.

    V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.

    To learn much more: Read the following: Click on Quick View.

    Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model – Untitled

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    David Horowitz Freedom Center. PO Box 55089. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423. (800) 752-6562. Elizabeth@horowitzfreedomcenter.org http://www.frontpagemag.com
    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/…/Rules%20for%20Revolution%20(2).pdfSimilar

    Style Vs. Substance

    January 15, 2010

    Style Vs. Substance

    I have a very strong admiration for Charles Krauthammer’s ability to frame and analyze a political/social issue.

    When he writes on a topic that I consider to be of central importance to our collective well-being, I will post his column and ferventlyhope that  you will read it. You should know that I when I do this it is because he has said what I would wish to say, but he has said it with greater wisdom and clarity than I can provide at this time.

    I will continue to write my own blogs as I am moved by historical, current, and future events to do so.

    The following is written by Charles Krauthammer. It is reproduced  from The Patriot Post.    www.patriotpost.us/us/subscribe/

    V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.,  1/15/10

       _____________________________________________________

    One Year Out: The Fall

    By Charles Krauthammer (Archive) · Friday, January 15, 2010

    WASHINGTON — What went wrong? A year ago, he was king of the world. Now President Obama’s approval rating, according to CBS, has dropped to 46 percent — and his disapproval rating is the highest ever recorded by Gallup at the beginning of an (elected) president’s second year.

    A year ago, he was leader of a liberal ascendancy that would last 40 years (James Carville). A year ago, conservatism was dead (Sam Tanenhaus). Now the race to fill Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat in bluest of blue Massachusetts is surprisingly close, with a virtually unknown state senator bursting on the scene by turning the election into a mini-referendum on Obama and his agenda, most particularly health care reform.

    A year ago, Obama was the most charismatic politician on earth. Today the thrill is gone, the doubts growing — even among erstwhile believers.

    Liberals try to attribute Obama’s political decline to matters of style. He’s too cool, detached, uninvolved. He’s not tough, angry or aggressive enough with opponents. He’s contracted out too much of his agenda to Congress.

    These stylistic and tactical complaints may be true, but they miss the major point: The reason for today’s vast discontent, presaged by spontaneous national Tea Party opposition, is not that Obama is too cool or compliant but that he’s too left.

    It’s not about style; it’s about substance. About which Obama has been admirably candid. This out-of-nowhere, least-known of presidents dropped the veil most dramatically in the single most important political event of 2009, his Feb. 24 first address to Congress. With remarkable political honesty and courage, Obama unveiled the most radical (in American terms) ideological agenda since the New Deal: the fundamental restructuring of three pillars of American society — health care, education and energy.

    Then began the descent — when, more amazingly still, Obama devoted himself to turning these statist visions into legislative reality. First energy, with cap-and-trade, an unprecedented federal intrusion into American industry and commerce. It got through the House, with its Democratic majority and Supreme Soviet-style rules. But it will never get out of the Senate.

    Then, the keystone: a health care revolution in which the federal government will regulate in crushing detail one-sixth of the U.S. economy. By essentially abolishing medical underwriting (actuarially based risk assessment) and replacing it with government fiat, Obamacare turns the health insurance companies into utilities, their every significant move dictated by government regulators. The public option was a sideshow. As many on the right have long been arguing, and as the more astute on the left (such as The New Yorker’s James Surowiecki) understand, Obamacare is government health care by proxy, single-payer through a facade of nominally “private” insurers.

    At first, health care reform was sustained politically by Obama’s own popularity. But then gravity took hold, and Obamacare’s profound unpopularity dragged him down with it. After 29 speeches and a fortune in squandered political capital, it still will not sell.

    The health care drive is the most important reason Obama has sunk to 46 percent. But this reflects something larger. In the end, what matters is not the persona but the agenda. In a country where politics is fought between the 40-yard lines, Obama has insisted on pushing hard for the 30. And the American people — disorganized and unled but nonetheless agitated and mobilized — have put up a stout defense somewhere just left of midfield.

    Ideas matter. Legislative proposals matter. Slick campaigns and dazzling speeches can work for a while, but the magic always wears off.

    It’s inherently risky for any charismatic politician to legislate. To act is to choose and to choose is to disappoint the expectations of many who had poured their hopes into the empty vessel — of which candidate Obama was the greatest representative in recent American political history.

    Obama did not just act, however. He acted ideologically. To his credit, Obama didn’t just come to Washington to be someone. Like Reagan, he came to Washington to do something — to introduce a powerful social democratic stream into America’s deeply and historically individualist polity.

    Perhaps Obama thought he’d been sent to the White House to do just that. If so, he vastly over-read his mandate. His own electoral success — twinned with handy victories and large majorities in both houses of Congress — was a referendum on his predecessor’s governance and the post-Lehman financial collapse. It was not an endorsement of European-style social democracy.

    Hence the resistance. Hence the fall. The system may not always work, but it does take its revenge.

    (c) 2010, The Washington Post Writers Group

    Beating Black and White Heads

    September 21, 2009

    Beating Black and White Heads

    On the nightly news, I watched as a black adolescent on a school bus repeatedly beat a white adolescent about the face and head with what I feared was lethal force. The white teen looked stuporous and offered no resistance as his head snapped away from each horrible punch, much like that of a yet supple dead man. I feared for the white kids life. A throng of other highly agitated black adolescents crowded around and cheered the face and head beater to beat more.

    Have whites been guilty of such acts against blacks? Yes, without question.

    Is there racial hatred between some blacks and some whites?  Yes, without question.

    Have race relations improved in America?  Yes, President Obama is living proof that it has.

    What is next to do?

    • Redouble our efforts to enjoin and reward good relations between all citizens of all races.
    • Forget about “hate crimes” and just punish the hell out of anyone who perpetrates violence against another.
    • Totally disregard the race, color, or creed of the criminals and the victims.
    • Stop the politics of race immediately!

    VTM, 9/21/09

        

    %d bloggers like this: