Posts Tagged ‘Muslims’

“Islamic Apartheid – Worldwide Pandemic”

May 12, 2011

I have been too busy trying to get things wrapped and to up to pack to leave for another walk in the woods of the U.P.. I’ll be gone about 5 days and will post items when I can find a hotspot for my laptop.

My friend Gonzo at gave me permission to post the following in its entirety. Do not fail to understand what is happening in the world and the United States. Radical Islam is in full bloody (as well as stealth) Jihad to establish dominance over the world of infidels. An infidel is defined as anyone who is not a Muslim.

Wake-Up America!

V. Thomas Mawhinney Ph.D.    5/12/11

Islamic Apartheid – Worldwide Pandemic

by Gonzo on May 10, 2011

Religious ApartheidApartheid is defined as crimes against humanity committed via systematic oppression and domination by one group over any other group/groups, and committed with the intention of maintaining or expanding that regime. Crimes that reach such status are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy or when wide practice of atrocities are tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder; extermination; torture; rape; political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity when they are part of a widespread or systematic practice.

I first started becoming aware of religious apartheid while following news stories about wide spread rape and murders by fundamental Islamists. I couldn’t help but notice how many different countries these heinous acts were being perpetrated in. I wondered if it was common for religious apartheid to occur in various countries, and why Islam seemed to be so predominant in the news stories. Now to be fair, the word “apartheid”, though it has Roman roots, is most commonly used with regard to South Africa and the internationally recognized racial apartheid that took place there. Present day Israel/quazi-Palenstine is another region of highly publicized accusations of apartheid, with both sides having convincing evidence that demonstrates systematic and government sponsored atrocities committed in the name of nationalism, but that is not really religious apartheid*. What I found most convincing, is the wide spread violence perpetrated by fundamental Islam that, taken as a whole, is clearly defacto apartheid, and the world seems largely unaware to its progress.

The most chilling examples of Islamic Apartheid is occurring in Pakistan, Egypt, and Africa, where Christians of all ages are being raped, tortured, and murdered either for being Christian, or as a method of forced conversion.


Example 1) Baby Neeha, at the age of 2, was raped by the son of her father’s employer and left to die by the roadside. No one was arrested for the crime. The rape occurred because Neeha’s father refused to convert to Islam, a conversion being pressured upon him by his employer. The remaining family now lives in Canada because of follow up death threats for the crime of speaking out against the murder of his infant child.

Example 2) 28 yo male student raped and murdered for not converting to Islam {Click Here}

Example 3) Hundreds of Christian girls have been systematically raped and tortured until they “convert” to Islam, and then are quickly married in sham Muslim ceremonies. If the girls refuse to convert, they are often further brutalized, murdered, or further brutalized under Sharia Law for “adultery”. {Click Here} If they do “convert” and escape, they are often hunted down as apostates, to be further brutalized.

Example 4) Christian couple attacked – man burned alive, wife raped, for refusing to convert to Islam:{Click Here} <-in this instance, it was actually the police who were raping the wife.

There are many many more examples of this kind of atrocity, too many to list in this article. The reason this is apartheid in Pakistan is not only because the police and religious leaders are taking part in the atrocity, but State court has ruled that conversion of kidnapped girls (knowing it is done by rape) is acceptable to ages as young as 7 years old. {Click Here} . So violent the oppression, that other Christians, fearing for their own safety, try to convince Christian victim’s family members from speaking out against the Muslim attackers. Clearly this is Apartheid, religious and Political, since Islam is chiefly a Theocratic Political System.


While there has always been strife between Christians and Muslims in various parts of Egypt, since the overthrow of the Mubarak regime, fundamentalists have been stepping up the systematic attack on Christians. Church bombings, kidnapping and raping of young girls and women for the purpose of attempted conversion (exact same atrocities as are occurring in Pakistan), and political executions stain what was once a movement toward a new era of tolerance and democracy in Egypt. So critical has the violence against Christians in Egypt become, that Christian leaders have called upon international bodies to convene on their behalf, and on the behalf of other Islamic sects that are being targeted by fundamental Islamic predators.
{Click Here}
In Egypt today, once moderate religious leaders now seem to be embracing the more radical elements of Jihad.

Sudan, Niger, Darfur, Mauratania:

In these countries, children of both sexes, and women, are being systematically kidnapped, raped, forcibly converted to Islam, or taken as sex slaves by Arab men, while Christian communities are held at gunpoint against their will in order to be preyed upon. {Click Here}
and another: {Click Here}

Saudi Arabia:

Having already reached absolute control, any Christian texts or symbols have been made illegal in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is the home land of the most radical sect of Islam, the Wahhabi (aka Salafi). Strict forms of Sharia law are practiced there as a means of population control and oppression.
{Click Here}
But that is not all that occurs in Saudi Arabia. In fact, apartheid is indoctrinated in school children through subversive State sanctioned teachings. The textbooks take a very aggressive stance against Jews and Christians whom it views as unbelievers and eternal enemies of Islam. And if you do not believe, or even doubt, that Christians and Jews are unbelievers, you are an infidel yourself, and as such, are no longer a “protected soul”, whom the killing of is not considered murder.

March 2003-2009: 1,960 Christians Killed, Homes of 500,000 Confiscated, 200,000 forced to pay Jizyah, & Christian Population Falls from 2.1 million to 500,000, and serial attacks on churches, Christian homes, Christian buildings, and Christian families still continue as fundamental Islam in Iraq has nearly completed the total apartheid extermination of Christianity in Iraq as remaining Christians are escaping in mass to save their lives or from being targets of forced conversion through rape, murder, kidnapping, and torture.


In all, Apartheid violence can be attributed to fundamental Islamists in a staggering 65 countries worldwide {Click Here} With such a staggering number of examples throughout the world, there is clear evidence that fundamental Islamists are systematically engaged in Religious/Political Apartheid against Christians, Jews, Hindu’s, Bahai’s (see Iran), and even other sects of Islam (as Shiite’s are being attacked by the radical form of Sunni=Salafi).

It would take an article hundreds of times longer than this one to list all of the events currently unfolding worldwide, with tens of thousands of incidents in the past decade. It is long past time for the international community to stand up and defend itself against this worldwide pandemic of fundamental atrocity committed under the guise of religious context, and at the hands of those who justify their crimes against humanity with Quranic versus.

Another factor which proves that this is apartheid is that the victims are systematically denied avenues for justice, either because those in power intimidate victim groups from speaking out, or enforce laws which effectually make speaking out against the law. Islamic States often have such laws whereby speaking out against an abusive system is considered blasphemy, which carries stringent punishment. According to Pew Polls, nearly 2/3 of Pakistani’s fear that fundamental Islamists will succeed in taking over the country. Apparently, they feel things could get worse. But how much worse can it be for those looking to escape Islam when a frightening 78% of Pakistani’s polled (84%+ in Egypt and Jordan) believe that the death penalty should be enforced against those leave Islam. Globally, polls of Muslims show a 30% agreement with the use of the death penalty for apostasy. While not the majority, given the wide spread belief in strict interpretations of Sharia Law, it is easy to understand how Islamic Apartheid can become such a global problem.

Wake up world! Your enemy is right under your noses and their goal is world domination through systematic rape, torture, murder, genocide, and enslavement. When the powers-that-be in these areas do nothing while the atrocities occur, and when they are spurred on by Islamic leaders in those communities, THAT is Apartheid. If the United Nations panel that is charged with preventing apartheid is incapable of recognizing and acting on this global issue, than it is time for free nations to act according to what is just to protect the children of the world from these savage attacks. Recognizing these demonic predators is not Islamophobia, it is a call to humanity against the inhumane.

How many more children must suffer while the rest of the world sleeps in apathy.
Demand from your politicians that they do more.

*However, the Palestinian Authority’s treatment of the Christians, Jews, women, gays and the refugees of 1948 has been compared by United Nations investigators, to South Africa’s treatment of non-whites during its apartheid era.

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)


The French Berka War

September 16, 2010

The French Berka War

Try fighting a war on two fronts, possibly a Third World War, coping with  monumental economic problems and then, also simultaneously dealing with the clash of  religious values that are incompatible with liberal democracies!

France is in for big trouble with Islam. It has recently outlawed the wearing of berkas. Recent bomb threats at major French landmarks may be related and may be  just the beginning.  All of these concerns are not simple paranoia or Islamophobia, anywhere in the world, including the U.S., insulting or in any way, disrespecting Islamic traditions leads to dire threats and even death for the offenders. Events in time will clarify these concerns.

Please take time to read the following article. You may ” bog down”  in the rightfulness or wrongfulness of France’s prohibition of the berka. But, in doing so, you will be missing the point.

French immigration policies have set up a great clash of powerfully incompatible cultures within its borders and it will now suffer the consequences.

Please read the following:

Wake-Up America!!!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.  9/15/10

Separation of Church and State vs. Shariah Law

September 14, 2010

Separation of Church and State vs. Shariah Law

Bruce commented on recent post about Shariah financing and Stealth Jihad.  His thoughts are informed by significant interactions with Middle-Eastern people and they are very well articulated.  In addition, they comport with my efforts to read-up on this subject focusing upon authoritative resources.

Thank you, Bruce, for the effort that you put into well-researched comments.

The following is a direct quote of Bruce’s comments:

On this, I could not agree with you more, although you have only touched on the subject. Now, granted, I am not a scholar of Sharia law, but I’ve heard enough from actual middle-easterners to know that there is merit to the following assertions-
The important thing about Sharia law is that it is believed by Muslims to be perfect and sacred. Law based upon democratic process is offensive to Islam because such law is believed to be from people, and not Allah. Sharia law is based upon the Koran and Mohammed, considered the only perfect guidance. Therefore, it is an offense to Islam for Muslims to have to live under democratic constitutional law. This is the reason that Muslims want to replace our banking laws with Sharia law and replace our family law with Sharia law.

Contrary to what you have posted, I believe a woman under Sharia law can divorce her husband, however, there are probably other implications which make that unlikely. Before anyone gets a warm fuzzy thinking that Sharia is then fair to both sexes, women should know that to make an accusation of rape, she must first have multiple men come forward as witnesses to the rape, else the woman has effectually admitted to adultery for which she will be brutally caned, stoned or even murdered for daring to allow herself to “give in” to the sexual perversion – and this at the hands of the woman/teen/little girl’s own family. Google Islam honor killing if you don’t believe me.

Some other aspects of Sharia law:
+ Women do not have the right to say no to their husbands demand for sex.
+ Provides for lawful beating of your wife for the transgression of showing signs of rebelliousness. IOW, if she disagrees with you about anything, beat her.
+ Provides for polygamy.
+ Provisions Jihad and “legalizes” the murdering of non-Muslims.
+ Provisions slavery.
+ Admonishes pictorial & statue art, as well as music.
+ Sets mandates for non-Muslims: Buildings can’t be higher than Muslim buildings; can’t recite non-Muslim scriptures; or have their own type of funerals; forbids the building of new churches;…others. IOW, pretty much non-Muslims are considered 2nd class citizens with no rights. This is why you hear about atrocities that occur to foreign national maids at the hands of Muslim home owners. Actually, you don’t hear much at all about it as it is not well publicized here, however, maids in Saudi Arabia have an exceptionally high rate of “suicide” and are often brutally beaten by their “employers”.

I also believe that once property is owned by a Muslim, it is never to be sold to a non-Muslim, else Islam is obligated to take the property back, using up to and including deadly force. Hence, the Park51 site is already a monument of Islam regardless of what building exists on that land.

With regard to forced marriage, Sharia law states that whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or the father’s father may marry her off without her permission, though it is “recommended to ask her permission if she has reached puberty”. This aspect of Sharia law suggests that a girl who has not reached the age of puberty can be married off to a man, who then, by the letter of the Sharia law, has the legal right to force himself on her, else she is beaten in to submission. A woman/teen/little girl has the right to say no to the marriage, but only if she is aware of the marriage, as a marriage can legally occur without her presence. A woman/teen/little girl’s silence regarding a marriage is the same as consent according to Sharia law. Of course, how can she say no to a marriage if it is performed without her knowledge or even in her presence? And yes, this is a practice found in many parts of the Islamic world as stories of such atrocities continue to emerge. Granted it may not be the norm, but it is not prosecuted as a crime, as Sharia law legitimizes it.

And yes, Sharia law also has provisions for cutting off the appendages of thieves, & provisions for what animals can be eaten and how animals for food are to be killed.

The USA and the various States already have laws in place. We do not need conflicting religious laws taking precedence over those laws. What part of separation of church and State do people not understand?

Now in fairness, Islam does point out that crime rates in Islamic countries are much lower than in other parts of the worlds. Of course, it is easier to have low instances of crime when even the most heinous acts of human brutality are legalized.

End Quote

Wake-Up America!!!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.    9/14/10


June 29, 2010


The following is a quote from “The Savage Nation”, By Michael Savage (pps. 135-136).

Muslims are now the largest religious minority in Germany, a status the Jews had in prewar Germany. But Ms. Merkel believes the situations are not entirely comparable. She said: ‘the Jews were Germans. They spoke the German language. But this is often not the case with the Turks’.

Merkel explains that in the 1970s, there were four million foreigners and two million of them had jobs. Today there are seven million foreigners, but the number with jobs has stagnated. Immigrants didn’t move into their labor market but into their social security system, she said.

This is the problem.

Immigrants are sucking the social security system of Germany dry as a bone. Her solution? Curtail foreigners by, for instance, speeding up deportation procedures for deportation of illegals and tightening regulations for family members to join immigrants already in Germany.

Did you hear that?

But she’s not anti-immigration. At the same time, she wants to lure highly qualified foreigners to the country. She said, ‘We want real specialists. We want to offer much better opportunities. We must be part of the war for talent in the world.’

Ms. Merkel is irritated by American calls to bring Turkey swiftly into the EU. You know why? She said, ‘Membership confers the right to work freely within the Union. Millions more Turks could pour into Germany. Imagine taking away the border between Mexico and the United States. It is just not possible in the foreseeable future.’

Ms. Merkel, why don’t you run for the president of the United States of America?

I maintain that ethnic diversity just for the sake of diversity is also a form of perversity. Ms. Merkel has made it clear that some immigrants are demonstratively more worthy of inviting into Germany than others. More than that, she wants to welcome into Germany skilled people with strong track records. That is the kind of sound policy toward immigration America must adopt if America is to remain strong.

End Quote.

The times when America can mindlessly admit immigrants because of family ties, or diversity quotas, or other reasons not related to building a stronger and more competitive nation are over. We are now in the process of self-destruction by immigration…among a plethora of other destructive acts that we ignorantly continue to inflict upon ourselves.

I will have more to say about our self-defeating immigration policies in the future.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D. 6/29/10

P.S. In the quote above, Ms. Merkel asks us to “imagine taking away the border away between Mexico and America”. What’s to Imagine? It has already been done! Ask Arizona…Ask the Obama Administration…ask the Bush Administration.

Stealth Jihad

September 24, 2009

Stealth Jihad

The following quotes are taken from Robert Spencer’s 2008 book, entitled “Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs”. The book is published by Regnery Publishing Inc.

The following several paragraphs are quoted from the Introduction of Spencer’s book. His words should motivate responsible citizens and voters to learn more about the possibility that Stealth Jihad could, along with many other contemporary forces, destroy America as we know it.

Begin quote:

In this book, I offer evidence for the proposition that terror attacks involving bombings and shootings are not the sum total of terrorist aspirations, but are just one component of a larger initiative. The goal of that initiative is the imposition of jihadists’ ideology all over the world—over their fellow Muslims and non-Muslims alike. That ideology may be summed up by the phrase “radical Islam,” although that term is used in many different ways. Some use it to suggest that it is only radicals—those who distort those teachings into “radical Islam”—who are responsible for violence in Islam’s name.

I am not using the phrase in that way. Rather, I have long contended that Islam is unique among the major world religions in having a developed doctrine, theology, and legal system mandating warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers. There is no orthodox sect or school of Islam that teachers that Muslims must coexist peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis.  I use the term “radical Islam” merely to distinguish those Muslims who are actively working to advance this subjugation from the many millions who are not, as well as to emphasize that the stealth jihad program is truly radical: it aims at nothing less than the transformation of American society and the imposition of Islamic law here, subjugating women and non-Muslims to the status of legal inferiors.

Those who are working to advance the subjugation of non-Muslims are not doing it soly by violent means. The common distinction between “radical” and “moderate” Muslims has generally been made between those who are engaged in blowing things up or are plotting to do so, and those who are not. However, the evidence presented in this book shows that the distinction ought to be placed elsewhere: Between those Muslims who believe that Islamic law is the perfect system for human society and who are working by whatever means to impose that Islamic law, and those Muslims who support Western pluralistic governments and seek to live with non-Muslims as equals, under secular rule, on an indefinite basis (pps. 4, 5 & 6).

Next quote:

The West today faces the threat of stealth jihadists. By using this term, I am not implying that they operate in secret; to the contrary, one of the key characteristics distinguishing them from their violent counterparts is that they carry out their business openly, carefully constructing a facade of moderation. What is stealth about these operatives is their ultimate agenda—they are not seeking to protect Muslim’s “civil rights” from the rampant “Islamophobia” that ostensibly plagues Western societies, as they claim. Rather, they are leading a full-scale effort to transform pluralistic societies into Ilsamic states, and to sweep away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and more.

The stealth jihadists have already made significant inroads into American life. They are well-funded, well-organized, and persistent. They will not be pacified by negotiations, compromises, or concessions; they cannot be bought off. And every day, they are advancing their agenda—while most Americans don’t even know they exist.


In his controversial book “America Alone”, Mark Steyn suggests that:

Europe is falling to the Islamic Jihad, and that only America will be left as a bulwark against Islamization. But it is unclear how much of a bulwark we will be if we allow our freedoms and way of life to be eroded in the name of “getting along.” That is exactly what is happening today. The stealth jihadists are working energetically to wear away the very fabric of American culture.

Its happening right now , under our noses (pps. 6 & 7)..

End of quotes.

Please view the following. Note the message, at the end of each page.

A Loving Gesture or Stealth Jihad?

VTM, 9/13/09

%d bloggers like this: