Posts Tagged ‘Muslimizing America II’

The Muslimizing Of America-II

January 22, 2015

The Muslimizing Of America-II.

This is the second in a short series of re-blogs related to America’s dire need to understand the barbaric and relentless nature of the Radical Islamic Terrorist movement against America…not to mention the rest of the entire world.

These re-blogs are based upon research (also the reading of the Koran) I did several years ago. This information is directly linked to current events and provides insight into the Islamic Terrorist’s unalterably fixed and murderous belief system. VTM,  1/22/15

__________________________________________________________

The following Muslim radical’s quotes were presented in Robert Spencer’s book, Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam Is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs.

If you will read the first 1-4 Muslim radical quotes from The Muslimizing Of America-I, you will now have all of them I have posted.

Here are the quotes. You may check their citations in Robert Spencer’s book.  I have provided their page numbers. Next to each quote.

5. “I have complete faith that Islam will invade Europe and America, because Islam has logic and a mission.” (p. 10)

6. “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” (P. 10)

7. ”I wouldn’t want to create the impression the I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future”. (p. 10)

8. “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.” (p. 10)

I have read that every political system contains the seeds of its own destruction. Radical Islamic “Stealth” Jihad is a highly intelligent, robust and indefatigable strategy to use the constitutional rights granted to citizens of liberal democracies to gradually subvert those governments and replace them with Islamic Sharia Law based upon the Koran.

It seems logical that America is most vulnerable to this form of take-over because our liberal democracy arguably grants the greatest number of constitutional rights to its citizens of all the liberal democracies.

In light of this diabolical strategy of Islamic Stealth Jihad, America’s greatest strength becomes its greatest weakness!

Wake-up America!

 V. Thomas Mawhinney, 6/14/10

 

 

 

 

Muslimizing America II

July 6, 2010

Muslimizing America II

Dear Gene,

I have had many friends and acquaintances (mostly fellow professors) who believe as you do. I have enjoyed debating with them over the years. It seems that we do not persuade each other, but others who listen-in may be influenced by the discussion and that is what free speech in liberal democracies is all about. So it may be with our discussion, but that will be a good thing too.

It is regrettable that when propositions, based upon strong research and documentation are promulgated, people often slander and vilify the communicator and/or the receivers. I see this done on both the political left and the right. However, current times are dominated by the progressive liberal left and political correctness is their favorite ploy: it is their game and strongest suit. Political correctness is a “blunt force” weapon used to pound the timid into silence and it works very well—but it works only on the timid. More to the point: Neither I, or the author (Robert Spencer) who I quoted and referenced, are spewing “vitriol”. Nor is what we are saying causing “paranoia”, “hatred”, or “rage”. Finally, our words are not irrational, nor are they causing irrational behavior.

There are several definitions of “rational thought” (i.e., having to do with logical analysis, or actions and thoughts that align with ones goals). I believe that everything that I had to say in the post, “Muslimizing America”, was based upon rational analysis. I also believe that any reader who became more concerned about stealth Jihad would also be thinking rationally.

The facts are that the Radical Islamic Jihadist movement, documented in the well-researched and authoritative books that I referenced on this topic (and elsewhere), now increasingly threatens the existence of liberal democracies around the world, including America. Islamic “Jihad” can consist of terrorist activity or surreptitious political activity designed to increasingly bring sociocultures under the rule of Sharia Law. Sharia Law is based on the Islamic Holy Book, the Qur’an.

The question should be: How will this fit in America, without the loss of what is quintessentially American?

The strongest and most self-defeating irrational behavior that I see, at this point, is that few of America’s citizens seem to notice or care about this continuation of the ancient Great Religious Crusades. From the perspective of Radical Islam, the Crusades have never ended.

When it comes to religious intolerance, few religions can compete with the Islamic religion. The Qur’an is replete with commands to slay and subjugate the pagans (often called infidels), especially Christians and Jews, wherever you can find them. Though all Christians may not follow the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule of The New Testament Bible, humility, peace, equality, kindness, and forgiveness are its main themes…not killing or enslaving the disbelievers.

Of course, we could all name Christians (or any other religion, including atheism—which is the worship of humans– who have done bad things. But to say:”Most of the damage to the planet, societies, and cultures has been wrought by Christians”; Or, “Christians have a disgraceful track record”; is by most long-term historical accounts simply not true. Here, I judge that your words, as you alleged of mine, are “over the top”. Others can decide who is correct on this matter.

In fact, it was the New Testament with its Christian ideals of love, kindness, and equal value among humans in the Eyes of God, that laid the foundation for the development of Western Civilization and the emergence of liberal democracies around the world with, voting (including suffrage), equal human rights and the ideal of equal treatment under the law. The idea that people can come together and vote to establish the laws they live under, as well as their own chosen leadership, is foreign to Sharia Law (based upon the Qur’an). Therefore traditional Islam is incompatible with liberal democratic societies. Please explain how Sharia Law in America will fit within our conception of Separation of Church and State?

Regarding your statements about the ruinous conquests by Christian nations, the concept of Manifest Destiny has been alive (in many iterations) since the beginning of time. It was, and still is, a Darwinian world and only the most fit sociocultures will survive for long.
In my view, a moderating influence upon this “dog-eat-dog” imperative in modern history has been the Liberal Democracies of the world who normally are not war-like, tend to avoid war with each other and who also tend to avoid Imperialism, in general.

The racial oppression that you justifiably condemn has been a staple of the world for all time. But in our time, America has replaced oppression with opportunity for minorities and has championed this human right ever since. In America, all that is left is for minorities to do is to take advantage of the unprecedented opportunities that are available in this great nation.
In one of your last remarks you said…” We have to be careful to not equate “Muslim” with “Terrorist”.

I agree with you on this point, with one proviso. I expect non-terrorist Muslims to vociferously reject and politically act against their fellow Muslims who are terrorists. Until I hear and see such activism from the Muslim community, I reserve my right to be suspicious of their possible Stealth Jihadist motives.

I do not mistake psychological, social or political naivety for sophistication. Nor do I mistake social, political, or economic chaos for personal freedom.

It remains a Darwinian world—liberal philosophy is largely irrational because it denies human nature and the ever-present brutal forces of natural selection among individuals and sociocultures. Conservative philosophy is largely rational because it embraces these facts. No one philosophy will have the best answer for every threat that confronts evolving Sociocultures. However, I am convinced that conservative principles and philosophies will generally provide the best odds for long-term survival among individuals and the sociocultures they comprise.

Finally, my dear friend, I am sorry to conclude that you are flat-out wrong about President Truman and “The Bomb”. If he had not used nuclear weapons on Japan during WWII it was, and still is, predicted that the war would have been significantly prolonged. Historical and recent predictions are that we would have lost many thousands more of our precious fighting men in an assault on the Japanese mainland and Japan also would have lost many thousands more killed and injured. I can agree with you that the nuclear bombing of Japan was a horrific event, but war is blood, guts and hell-on-earth and it had to be done.

If Japan or Germany would have beaten us to the creation of nuclear bombs, and a system to deliver them, they would have wildly celebrated the destruction of America and its allies. Then, you and I may never have lived long enough to enjoy the good fortune of knowing each other.
The truth will set us free: But, first it will make us miserable.

Gene, God’s Blessings to you and your loved ones. It was great to see you and Elsa at our 50th Class Reunion!

Tom 7/6/10


%d bloggers like this: