Archive for February, 2016

Islamic Rioters Chant: “Obama! Obama! We Love Obama!”

February 28, 2016

Islamic Rioters Chant: “Obama, Obama, We Love Obama!”

The following is a video is of a violent riot by Islamic immigrants in Sydney Australia. They appeared to be beyond control and they beat at least two police officers bloody and senseless.

If you doubt the accuracy of this title, be sure to listen carefully, particularly near the end of the video.

I call this and all other similar examples, cultural suicide by Islam.

I will also call the our last two Presidential terms America’s suicide by Obama.

I defy you to argue otherwise.

Thanks to Lee Hornack for sending this video to me.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, 2/28/16

“The Brit” Explains Trumpophilia: Its Really American Truthophilia!

February 25, 2016

“The Brit” Explains Trumpophilia: Its Really American Truthophilia!

“The Brit” will give many more truth than they can stomach. But, just hang-in there and watch this short video.

The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, 2/15/16

P.S., Thanks to Joe Grunert for sending this video to me.

Rush Limbaugh: On Getting Along With Liberals

February 24, 2016

Rush Limbaugh: On Getting Along With Liberals
Yes, Rush can be bombastic, but he is seldom inaccurate.What he said on yesterday’s radio show is so important that Drudge placed his entire manuscript on his Drudge report.

I have only selected a portion of his transcript because it is too long to present here.

But this major quotation of Rush interacting with a caller is essential for America to understand and to believe.

I will tell you that what he says is the unvarnished truth and I urge to to send it to everone who you know.

The following is a direct quote and it is long. However, it is very important that you take time to read it…and then vote to defend America from liberalism’s effort to destroy our way of life.


CALLER:  Well, you said a lot, and if I’m going to be completely honest — because I think that’s what we all need to be at this stage of the game — I was not aware of the entire Gang of Eight bill.  I did not know details and how you explained them and the votes that Mario (sic) and the Gang took.  But I will say this, Rush.  We are on a precipice, and we have got to face reality.  And as you’ve mentioned and said on your program many times, there is no perfect candidate.  In this election, we need somebody who can bring this country together and not divide it like the current candidates are.  And I’m speaking of Donald Trump.  I feel like he’s exploiting the American people and their anger.  I’m angry, too, but — 

RUSH:  May I interrupt you here for a second?  And don’t worry, you’ll have your time.  But I’ve gotta stop you on something. 

CALLER:  Yes? 

RUSH:  This whole notion of working together, bringing the country together? We’re way past that.  We’re never… We’re not gonna unify with the liberal Democrats.  We’re not. There’s no candidate out there that can forge a kumbaya.  These people have to be defeated, Pam. 

CALLER:  Do you not…? 

RUSH:  They have to be defeated. There’s no unity here.  There never, really, has been in this country, anyway.  It’s always been a contest for leadership. 

CALLER:  Well, let me ask you this question.  Do you truly believe — truly (giggles), with every ounce, every fiber in your being — that we can truly defeat the mind-set that is now occurring in our country?  Do you not think that we have kind of crossed a line now where we’re going to have to find a candidate that…? I’m as conservative as you’re going to get, and I understand now that I have to be realistic with who I think can actually win and defeat Hillary Clinton in November. 

RUSH:  Right. 

CALLER:  You even shared a while back the candidates now, if you would get Kasich out, if you would get Carson out, if you would get one of those out, those votes most likely, they’re negatives of Donald Trump, surpass his… his — 

RUSH:  No, other people are saying that.  I haven’t. 

CALLER:  But you were reciting polls or whatever. 

RUSH:  Right.  Right. Nobody knows.  We do have a preliminary indication that some Jeb Bush voters are going to Trump. But there’s not enough days that have gone by for that to be known.  I’ve gotta ask you to hold on.  We’ll continue the conversation here, Pam, after the bottom-of-the-hour break here, ’cause this is important.  This whole business of… There’s two things I want to tackle with you here.  Don’t go away.


RUSH;  Now back to Pam in Brentwood, Tennessee. 

CALLER:  Hi there. 

RUSH:  Now, two things.  I want to be understood on this.  You said that we need to have somebody bring the country together, and a lot of people talk about bringing the country together, unifying us, making factions of people who disagree somehow come together.  I don’t think that that’s gonna happen.  We’re too divided.  And they are not interested in it, Pam.  The people on the left, they don’t want to reach common ground with us.  We are gnats to them, or worse.  We are the Gestapo to them.  We’re Nazis to them.  We are standing in the way of whatever they want.  

These people have to be defeated.  They have to be overwhelmed.  And then after they’re defeated they cannot be allowed to bully whoever wins into cowardice and caving in.  It’s going to be tough.  Winning an election is just a tiny first step.  After we win the election, it’s gonna take perseverance to prevail over all the attempts to subvert the winners of the election and to corrupt what’s going on, knowing they still own a lot of the bureaucracy.  

But if you believe in a certain cultural America, it’s under siege.  There’s nothing to join with on the other side in preserving it.  They want to tear it down, transform it, and rebuild it.  They have to be defeated.  This is why the Republican Party’s worthless.  They don’t even think this way. 
The Republican Party’s thinking about showing they can work together, they can cooperate, make Washington work.  Sorry; we’re so past that, we’re so far past that, it’s irrelevant.  We’re talking about holding on and preserving the country as founded.  And it’s gonna be really, really hard.  

The second thing is, “Rush,” — and this is not just you — “Rush, we can’t deport 12 million people.  We’re never gonna –” Who says?  All that is is a conversation stopper.  We are the United States of America.  Who says we can’t get rid of people who are here illegally?  It’s not a question of we can’t.  It’s a question of do we have the resolve to?  Do we have the desire to?  Does it makes sense to do it?  Are we gonna do it — and, believe me, even if we win on this, the people opposing it are gonna be firing ammo at whoever wins like you can’t believe.  

But if we’re serious about stopping this transformation of America, it isn’t gonna be easy, and winning an election is not gonna send a signal to the other side to stand down, you lost.  They don’t look at it that way.  This is a fight between socialism and capitalism, freedom versus tyranny, however you want to categorize.  There isn’t any overlap.  The only things that we may have in common with them are what people want for their families.  But we can’t even agree on the definition of a family with half of these people.  So I don’t think all the putting our hands together and coming together and unifying and working and making the country come together and common ground, we’re so far past that, if we’re serious about what we want. 

CALLER:  And I didn’t mean to be touchy-feely when I was referring to that.  I think there’s a way you can unify people. Well, we know there is, because his name was Ronald Reagan.  And I feel like we have been given a gift, the Republican, the conservative movement, whatever you want to call it, we’ve been given two gifts, and they are Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.  And if this is not the time where we can bring a candidate who has those qualities as much as we can look for them in a candidate on our side right now to win this election, I believe we will start seeing a shift in tone and we will start converting minds.  Listen, I was at Mario’s rally in Franklin, Tennessee, this past weekend. 

RUSH:  Hm-hm. 

CALLER:  And there were supposedly going to just be a thousand people, and they had to open it into the parking lot.  There was around five to six thousand people.  That was their estimate.  He was the closest thing that I have ever experienced to Ronald Reagan in my entire adult life.  I just feel like that argument that we can’t start bringing people to our side, in quotation marks, is not valid right now because we are now in a great position because there are so — 

RUSH:  Look, I’m not even making this about Rubio or any candidate right now, but you’re making my point.  You’re citing the eighties and Reagan, and you mean his landslide victories as bringing people together.  Well, then why aren’t we still together?  What the hell happened?  Two landslides. We had the greatest economy the country’s known in our lifetimes. We had low unemployment. We had burgeoning job growth. We had individual and personal wealth that was going like crazy.  We brought down the Soviet Union.  Why are we still not unified?  How did the left tear that down?  ‘Cause they sure did.  

Because even when Reagan was bringing everybody together, they didn’t stop.  The Democrats in Congress were aligning with Soviet communist client states in central America and Grenada and wherever else they could find to undermine Ronald Reagan.  Teddy Kennedy was going to the Soviet Union and telling Soviet leaders: do not fall for anything Reagan does for you, Reagan is a trick, Reagan is a bad actor, whatever.  

They were doing everything they could to undermine Reagan during his entire eight years. They hated Reagan as much, if not more so, than they hated George Bush, because Reagan was more successful than George W. Bush.  It was brutal. It was vicious.  And if the country had been brought together, and if the country during those eight years had actually learned that it was conservatism and Reaganism that led to all of that bounty and the end of the Soviet Union, the Democrats would have never stood a chance.  They would have been ended.  

But it was just four short years later and here comes Bill and Hillary Clinton.  And why?  Because the next president got rid of Reaganism.  The next president started making deals with the Democrats to show that we can do deals, to show that we’re nice guys, to show that we can get along.  My point is, we had the greatest economic circumstances in our lifetimes and the Democrats were not interested, Pam.  They didn’t want to participate, because it left them out of power.  

It’s not about a great country to them.  It’s not about the American people doing the best they can do for themselves.  That’s actually bad news for the Democrat Party, because all that means is people don’t need government, people don’t need the Democrats, people don’t want them, they’re not dependent.  Bad, bad news.  Can’t have that.  Why do you think Ted Kennedy decided to reinstitute amnesty and illegal immigration during Reagan’s second term?  They had to undermine it somehow.  And we went along with it because we accepted a promise that we would secure the border and those three million in 1986 would be it.  And here we are talking 12 million, which I think is probably closer to 15 or 20 million.  

In the midst of abundance, in the midst of economic prosperity like we hadn’t known since the postwar boom, the Democrat Party was trying to tear it down and succeeded.  There isn’t a Jesus Christ running that’s gonna unify everybody.  And I hate to say it, Jesus Christ didn’t, either.  Unity is one of these things that sounds wonderful, sororities love it, fraternities pretend to love it so they can get inside the sororities, but it’s nothing more than a dream.  This is a world governed by the aggressive use of power, the aggressive use of force, and if you want to maintain both, you have to fight for it each and every day.  It’s never permanently won.  You never permanently convert people.   

Even average, ordinary Americans who ended up having economic prosperity they’d never known in the 1980s, were talked out of it. In four short years, they were convinced it was phony. They were convinced it was a party that we didn’t deserve, and we ran up all these deficits (which was a lie), and we had to now start paying it back. Sam Donaldson at ABC News said, “We’ve got a big credit card bill, folks, because of the Reagan eighties and we gotta pay it back.”  BS!  That’s what we’ve got now! The deficit was coming down with Reagan! 

The national debt was stagnant.  It wasn’t growing under Reagan.  Well, it was, but the deficits eventually were brought under control.  And in 1994 we actually balanced a budget for the first time in my lifetime.  All that’s gone, because we have not had a Republican Party that accepts conservatism and fights for it and preserves victories when we get them!  So every day… Do you ever notice what we talk about?  We talk about stopping things.  Every Republican think tank, every conservative media whatever, organization — including this show — every day is devoted to how do we stop them?  

We don’t have time to get around to what we want to advance.  We’re too busy stopping.  They’re not talking about stopping anything.  They’re on the march! They’re on the march and succeeding with things that ten years ago you would have never thought would ever happen.  Gay marriage?  Today in a lot of cities, you can walk into any bathroom you want claiming you’re a “transgender” and you decide to present female that day, so you walk into the ladies’ restroom.  That’s becoming a matter of law.  

Ten years ago you’d have been laughed out of this country if you’d have thought that would ever happen.  They are not stopping anything, except us. But they’re on the march advancing each and every day.  We talk about stopping things.  Now, you can correlate all this to the current presidential race, and maybe answer some questions you have about why and how people are doing, not doing well, doing poorly or what have you. 

Because the American people, I’ve just described how they feel about all this.  Mine is the most common view.  Everything I just said is what a majority of conservative-oriented, cultural Americans believe.  They’re scared to death over this!  They’re frustrated; they’re ticked off; they’re angry.  They want to do more than just stop something every day.  They’re tired of being overrun.  They’re tired of not having allies in the centers of power where this stuff can be stopped.  It’s not hard to understand.  

But it is.  

Because once you accept the task at hand and what has to happen, winning the election, that’s equivalent being born, and we’re an infant, and we’ve got people coming at us that are gonna try to wipe us out and eliminate everything and pretend it didn’t happen, corrupt, sabotage, undermine. Whoever the next president is, and whoever’s running the next Congress, and whoever nominates the Supreme Court justice, if it’s a conservative, you have no idea what’s gonna be brought to bear!  

We’re gonna need people with such backbone and guts and steel and iron to hold up and to withstand what’s gonna come at ’em, you can’t even imagine it.  But it’s what’s gonna happen.  So it’s all of that that informs me each and every day here, folks, as to what happens on this program, analyzing what’s going on out there.  This is for keeps! This isn’t about unifying, getting along.  They’re not interested in it — and what do you want to get along with ’em over?  What about their agenda do you want to embrace? 

End Quote:

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D. 2/24/16




Why America Should Hate Liberalism #5

February 22, 2016

Why America Should Hate Liberalism #5

A dear friend and fellow patriot, Karen Kuiper, commented about my series, Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism.

I interpreted her remarks to indicate her bewilderment about how Liberals could be so stupid as to consistently pass laws, or ignore laws, that make matters worse for America’s citizens and speed our decline as an international power.

My research into the workings of liberal philosophies and practices, the world around, has led me to a simple conclusion.

Once liberalism gains control of a political system, a political and socioeconomic system must be driven into destruction before a significant proportion of the affected citizens will rise-up and put an end to Liberalism’s pathologically destructive hegemony.

Control, or better put, the counter-controls against liberalism remain the ultimate challenge. It was once thought that America’s unique and masterfully designed Constitution was enough, but liberalism has found ways to defeat even that.

We shall now see about the matter of Control.

I fear this national election could be the tipping-point to a fast slide into a long American nightmare.

The following was my answer to my friend, Karen.

The simple reason why Liberalism consistently does self-defeating things was also hard for me to understand.

But, everything will “click into place”, cognitively, as soon as we change our perspective on Liberalism’s guiding motives.

Very simply put, Liberals are driven to increase their power. They are generally pathologically selfish and irresponsible. They do not care about America’s future, or that of its citizens.They say they do because it is what the public wants to hear and it helps them win elections.

Liberals care only about their own growing high status and the growth of their political power. It is in their best interests that the culture deteriorate to a hellish state.

In this way liberals have criminals, poor ignorant illegal aliens, drug addicts, single mothers in poverty with children, pregnant teens, sex addicts, gambling addicts, drug addicts, and bankrupt/broken businessmen, etc., who will vote for them in order to get more free medicine, housing, food, phones, electricity, health care, and so-on.

This is the unhappy conclusion that I have been forced to by the consistent world-wide evidence.

Do not listen to what the liberals say…just watch what they do and pay attention to how it benefits them in their mad quest for political power and permanent membership in America’s ruling class.


P.S. I challenge anyone to debate these perceptions with me.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D.

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #4

February 21, 2016

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #4

The following are a series of ideas and paraphrases taken from Micheal Martin’s excellent book; Liberalism: The Demise of America.

  •  Liberals hope to construct utopias by planning and designing socialist or communist states and embracing the idea of a transnational government. The many failures of socialist and communist states are well documented (Russia, China, North Korea, and much of Latin America, for examples). To the extent that any such states have recovered from their socialist/communist disasters, they have implemented important components of free market enterprises.
  • Regarding Transnational States, The history of gross failure of both the League of Nations and its successor, The United Nations are illustrative of the old saying: “Too many chefs spoil the brew.” This is particularly true when a large number of the chefs are socialist and communist nations.
  • Liberals systematically increase state control over citizen’s behavior. They do this through the control of education, the popular media, the news media, and though increasing restrictions on citizen’s speech via political correctness. The weakening of religious influences over population behavior is also a major goal of Liberals.
  • American Liberalism is also destroying, capitalism, families, Constitutional governance, law, moral values, and the incentives/work/vigor and the independence of individuals.
  • Liberals destroy economies trough reckless spending and massive debt. This is an age-old trick of dispensing governmental entitlements, and redistributing the taxed wealth of productive citizens. This is done in order to win political support from a growing population of unemployed, irresponsible and dependent citizens who then become “a captured” voting block for liberal candidates. This selfish and irresponsible political strategy strengthens liberal political parties in the short-run, but reliably destroys entire sococultures in the long-run.
  • Liberal philosophy, like communist philosophy, believes that only “superior” leaders (i.e., a liberal ruling class) can effectively plan and execute environmental, social, and other cultural outcomes. They believe that they can shape the will and motivations of the population in ways superior to spontaneous social and free market economic forces. They are pathologically narcissistic in their beliefs of personal and group superiority and they are sociopathic in their willingness to lie, cheat, steal and propagandize in an attempt to achieve their goals.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 2/21/16

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #3

February 19, 2016

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #3

The following is a direct quote from Dr. Michael G. Martin’s book: Liberalism: The Demise of America .

Not only will it be well worth your time to read and think about these two paragraphs: It is your patriotic duty to do so.

America’s future hangs in the balance of a general understanding of the following  perceptions of reality.


Liberals want to change society so that there are no longer losers, malcontents, or the irresponsible. It is strange that the policies they tout involve perverse incentives, so these bad behaviors are actually promoted and incentivized. This applies to drug addiction, hard work, sexual responsibility, and the like. Liberals think compassion will change everything. They believe people are malleable and plastic, susceptible to change—but even if this were true, it must be accomplished though the proper incentives and social and economic context. They appear to be behaviorists, but yet they are employing perverse incentives to get change. This is a puzzle that defies comprehension.

It’s interesting that liberals believe they can change society and the nature of individuals when they don’t believe in individual responsibility or accountability for individuals. They see the life of the individual as being largely deterministic. That is to say, their behavior is shaped by social and environmental forces beyond their control. If an individual can’t affect his own life, how can liberals argue that they can change the nature of society and individuals? On the scale of the collective, then, they are basically acknowledging that they escape the thrall of determinism.

Perhaps the explanation is that they believe the common man is too stupid to affect his life, but that the elite—the smart people—can basically re-engineer not only themselves, the society, and the very nature of human beings themselves. Liberals are saying in effect, then, that the common man—really the stupid people—is totally malleable. He can be made into anything the liberal elite want, good or bad. There are strong assumptions here about not only human nature, but the influence of other unseen and not-understood forces that shape human behavior, as well as the ability of the liberal elite to engineer the wrenching change that they desire.

Kindle pages 261 and 262.

End Quote:

I am a behavioral psychologist and a great admirer of B. F. Skinner, perhaps the greatest psychologist of the 20th century.

Skinner and other behaviorists rightfully ascribe great power to the environment to shape the behavior patterns of humans and other animals. Furthermore, Skinner, as well as many behaviorists acknowledge the strength of genetic determinants upon human psychological adaptations as they interact and are influenced, in very complex ways, by a plethora of environmental influences.

It is important for Americans to understand that is no “free will”, in the sense that humans are totally free from genetic and environmental influences.

No population can escape the influences of their genetics, social and physical environments. The best that can be done, in my judgment, is to educate citizens about the scientific principles of these influences and also teach them to come under the control of the imperatives of survival for their own society, their own loved ones who will outlive them and their loved-ones who are yet to be born.

This bright future will require that Americans relearn the advantages of forsaking immediate gratifications in favor of highly beneficial long-term outcomes. It will also require that we again venerate and teach the compliance with rules of living and conduct that insure such future benefits.

My reading of American and World History has led me to conclude that the “Wisdom of the Ages” resides in the Judeo/Christian precepts and values for personal conduct that once helped make America great. The same can be said of other compatible religions of the world.

The teaching of, and compliance to, these precious guides for life are powerfully augmented when a society encourages the belief in a Higher Power than that of the self-destructive philosophy of secular humanism forms the basis of liberalism,  progressivism, socialism and communism.

Only then we can we hope that our Constitutional Republic might endure thorough our representative democratic political process and citizen voter counter-controls on governmental actions.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 2/19/16

Professor Emeritus of Psychology, Indiana University South Bend


Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #2

February 14, 2016

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #2

One of the prime targets for liberalism’s conquest of America has been our institutions of education.

In this way Liberalism captures our youth, often shackles them to debt and governmental dependency, and/or forces unsuspecting parents and tax payers to cover the increasingly absorbent costs for an “education”.

The word education is in quotations because, what passes for education, is too often less a real education and more a liberal/Marxist propaganda machine.

Perhaps you have been astonished by very bright college educated youth who sanctimoniously parrot liberal philosophy, without any historical understanding of the real-world failed performances of these ideas and cultural designs.

A term for such propaganda outcomes, used to describe Korean concentration camp “re-educational” methods, was “brain washing”.

I urge parents to choose their children’s educational programs with very great care, from start to finish.

Please see the following for George Will’s very clear and factual expose’ of the propaganda camps that many  of America’s Colleges and Universities have become.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 2/14/16

Thanks to Vic Palenski for sending this video to me.

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism

February 13, 2016

Why Americans Should Hate Liberalism #1

I am reading the following massively informative and well-documented book by Michael G. Martin, Ph.D.. Dr. Martin is an International Economist who has visited over 100 different Nations.

I cannot recommend his book highly enough to all Americans as we approach the 2016 Presidential Election: An election upon which the very life of America’s Constitutional Republic may hinge.

Liberalism: The Demise of America (2013), Michael G. Martin, Ph.D.

The following main points are paraphrased from Dr. Martin’s Prologue.

  • America’s Founding Fathers drafted our Constitution to maximize liberty from governmental control. The idea was for citizens to manage their government and to be free of the tyranny of habitually increasing power and dominance inherent in all levels of government.
  • America’s War of Independents, the Civil War, WWI and WWII were fought to preserve our independence from governmental dictators and the controls they impose upon citizens inalienable rights.
  • Liberals have increasingly destroyed America’s constitutional protections against governmental control and regulation of citizens, at all levels. Liberals hate America’s Constitutional restrictions on their power to control our behavior, tax us and manage or manipulate our businesses and the free market.
  • America, and Western Culture, are in steep decline largely because of Liberal social, educational, legal, economic, international governmental, military, and multicultural immigration policies.  America and Western Civilization are committing sociocultural suicide by adopting liberal political policies.
  • Liberalism is an irrational political and social philosophy because its policies invariably lead to social chaos and economic decline.
  • Liberalism Kills independence, traditional values, history, education, justice, military, law and order, business, and eventually it destroys itself and the sociocultures that adopt its practices.
  • Dr. Martin quotes George Washington: “Our greatest enemy is the criminal and the state; the latter is a greater threat than the former and moreover transforms itself into the former as well.”
  • America is now embracing the same ideology it defeated during the Cold War (Communism and Socialism). We are destroying our selves with the very political systems we fought so very hard to defeat!

End of paraphrasing.

There are many reasons to hate liberalism; not the least-of-which is the fact that liberalism is now destroying your own Constitutional Republic…the only one like it ever in the history of the world!

I hope you will send this, and the series to follow, to everyone you know.

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 2/13/16


How To Separate Real Conservatives From Phonies!

February 8, 2016

How To Separate Real Conservatives From Phonies!

The following are key identifiers enumerated in The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot, by Russell Kirk ( page 8).

The following are called “cannons of conservative thought”:

  1. There is a “Belief in a transcendent order, or a body of natural law, which rules society as well as conscience. Political problems, at bottom are religious and moral problems.”
  2. There is an “Affection for the proliferating variety and mystery of human existence, as opposed to the narrowing uniformity, egalitarianism, and utilitarian aims of most radical systems; conservatives resist what Robert Graves calls “logicalism” in society.”
  3. A “Conviction that civilized society requires orders and classes, as against the notion of a ‘classless society’. With reason, conservatives often have been called ‘the party of order’. If natural distinctions are effaced among men, oligarchs fill the vacuum.  Ultimate equality in the judgment of God, and the courts of law, are recognized by conservatives; but equality of condition, they think, means equality in servitude and boredom.”
  4. The “Persuasion that freedom and property are closely linked: separate property from private possession, and Leviathan becomes master of all. Economic leveling, they maintain, is not economic progress.”
  5. “Faith in prescription and distrust of ‘sophisters’ (i.e., clever politician’s and philosopher’s whose arguments are designed to deceive; think Barack Obama), ‘calculators, and economists’ who would reconstruct society upon abstract designs. Custom, convention, and old prescription are checks upon man’s anarchic impulse and upon the innovator’s lust for power.”
  6. A “Recognition that change may not be salutary reform: hasty innovation may be a devouring conflagration, rather than a torch of progress. Society must alter, for prudent change is the means of social preservation; but a statesman  must take Providence” ( i.e., God and nature) “into his calculations, and a statesman’s chief virtue, according to Plato and Burke, is prudence” (i.e., skillful good judgment).

Conservatives have used these guidelines for over two centuries. These are the values and beliefs that have built America as the greatest nation in the history of the world.

It is only the abandonment of these values and beliefs that have led to America’s great present decline. 

Vote only for true conservatives.

Do not listen to what politicians say. Research how they have behaved through history. Vote only for true conservative behavior patterns or….kiss our once great America goodbye!

V. Thomas Mawhinney, Ph.D., 2/8/16

P.S. Please send this blog to your citizen friends and family

Republican Debate Moderators “Dis” Dr. Carson

February 7, 2016

Republican Debate Moderators “Dis” Dr. Carson

I get that Dr. Carson is low in the polls.

But, that is no reason to put him on stage and publicly isolate him from the Republican Debate!

The Republicans have a bad reputation for ignoring, and not caring for minorities. Unfortunately, last night’s debate proved the case.

Dr. Ben Carson’s treatment by moderators was brutally diminishing to this outstanding American gentleman. What in the hell were they thinking?!

America needs quality minorities in the political lime-light and Dr. Carson is one of America’s finest citizens.

To add insult to injury, this abusive public political treatment occurred on the heels of allegations that he had been mistreated (true or not) by a Cruz campaign’s dirty trick.

If the Republican Party were truly a conservative party, the intermediate and long-term effects of their values and consistent actions would catalyze the upwards mobility of all hard-working citizens, irrespective of ethnicity.

I believe the the Republican Party and last night’s moderators owe Dr. Ben Carson a public apology.

I can only hope that Dr. Carson will be selected as a Republican Vice-Presidential candidate.

With this experience under his belt, who knows what would be in store for the conservative’s potentially best answer to the radical liberal’s Marxist President, Barack Obama.

V. Thomas Mawhinney,  2/7/16

%d bloggers like this: